March 4, 2008

Bankruptcy does not Insulate a Drunk Driver from Liability or Judgment for Personal Injury Damages - Illinois Drunk Driver Severely Injured my Client

If you are the injured victim of a drunk driving accident in Missouri, Illinois, or any other state your personal injury lawyer should know that the drunk driver cannot insulate himself from liability by declaring bankruptcy. The Federal bankruptcy law is very clear on this point. See, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(9) exceptions to bankruptcy discharge include "(9) for death or personal injury caused by the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft if such operation was unlawful because the debtor was intoxicated from using alcohol, a drug, or another substance"

illinois%20belleville%20drunk%20driving%20accident%20lawyer.jpgAs discussed in a previous entry, I am currently handling a case where a drunk driver slammed into the rear of my client's car when she was waiting at a stop light in Belleville IL. See Drunk Driving Car Accident Picture and ALLSTATE UNDERHANDED NEGOTIATION TACTICS Allstate has refused to settle the case for a reasonable amount and when my client refused to accept their low offer Allstate, through their insurance lawyers and the insured drunk driver, threatened that their insured, the drunk driver, would declare bankruptcy if my client did not take their low offer for settlement of her Illinois drunk driving personal injury claim as a result of Allstate's insured drunk driver.

After calling Allstate out on their misrepresentation about the law they now claim, through their lawyer, that only punitive damages would be prevented from discharge in bankruptcy and all the compensatory damages would be discharged; another blatant misrepresentation of the law. The motivation behind this bad faith action by Allstate is two fold:

1. They want their insured feel safe that any judgment over the policy limits will not come back on him personally. This is done to explain to their insured why they are not settling a drunk driving case within policy limits when we are willing to do so. Thus opening their insured up to an excess judgment.

2. Allstate, through their lawyers, are hoping that I am stupid and will fall for their threat of bankruptcy and convince my client to take their low offer. Fortunately, I did not sleep through law school. Additionally, as a Missouri and Illinois personal injury lawyer, I have argued this point in past cases in federal court, and it is clear that a drunk driver's liability cannot be discharged.

Allstate is willing to sell out their insured and make ridiculous legal claims in order to save a buck and try to protect a drunk driver that seriously injured my client. This is coming from the self proclaimed "Good Hands" people, that when they take off those white gloves expose their truly dirty hands with their bad faith negotiation tactics.

SAMPLE PETITION - Prevent Discharge of Judgment or other Debt Arising From Drunk Driving Car Accident - Prevent at Fault Drunk Driver from Avoiding Liability by Declaring Bankruptcy

July 26, 2007

DWI Law and DUI Law - Missouri and Illinois Police Enforcement Crossing the Line Too Often

I handle a lot of DWI and DUI cases in Missouri and Illinois and have seen a lot of very interesting cases. As a DWI lawyer, it is disturbing, the number of cases wherein the police blatantly step over the line of proper policing by consistently stopping people solely on the the gamble that if a person is driving late at night on a weekend, and particularity a holiday weekend, that they are drunk driving.

Two drunk driving cases I recently handled last month highlight this abuse and the descriptions below are based on undisputed facts:

1. Designated driver goes through a sobriety checkpoint in a convertible, police officer interviews him briefly, indicates he is fine, and tells him to proceed. Well, the driver was taking his friends to a local gas station for beer and on the way back the same officer accused him of drinking and driving and ran him through a battery of field sobriety tests and arrested him without probable cause, why? because there was a case of beer in the back of the car. No other possible explanation for the harassment.

BXP35732h.jpg

2. Police stop my client who was driving an ATV, specifically, a Rhino 660, which is a side by side seater 4 wheeler that essentially looks like a small jeep. The officer stopped him because he was on the road for a brief time to get to his neighbors property. The officer arrested him for DWI and illegal operation of an ATV on the road. Again, ridiculous! The Missouri definition of an ATV that is illegal to drive on the road is less than 600lbs, straddle seating as opposed to side by side, handlebars as opposed to a steering wheel, and less than 50: wide. My client's vehicle clearly, upon simply looking at it, did not fall under any of these specifications.

My advice to the police, enforce the laws on the books and stop using the ends to justify the means of arrest through harassment an blatantly unfounded charges. I vigorously fight these cases.

July 18, 2007

Missouri DWI Law Now Allows the State to Introduce BAC Results from Blood Tests Obtained Using an Alcohol Swab

To my dismay as a DUI and DWI Lawyer, Gov. Matt Blunt recently signed legislation closing a claimed "loophole" in Missouri law that required the use of a non-alcohol swab when taking a blood test. If an alcohol swab is used the result is inadmissible in court.

How is this a loophole? Requiring police to properly administer a blood draw, that's a loophole? It is not difficult or unreasonable to require the use of an iodine swab or other permissible disinfectant, in fact most police carry blood draw packs that have all the necessary and previously allowed disinfectants.

On July 2, 2007 HB 574 was signed into law. It was prompted by a 2004 DWI arrest of Rep. Charles Portwood, R-Ballwin, following a one vehicle accident when his vehicle ran through a fence and hit a pool house.

The Officer that arrested him used an alcohol swab to draw the blood, therefore, the result was inadmissible and supposedly forced the prosecutor to drop the case. This is the excuse used to pass this law.

Fact is, almost everybody who refuses a test (therefore no BAC result) are still prosecuted, why? because your demeanor, smell, speech and other factors observed by the officer are admissible to show intoxication and are enough to convict you, granted it makes it harder.