Missouri Injury Law Blog

In Missouri, injury claims, such as a car or truck accident, are valued by the amount of harms and losses suffered by the victim. There are two general types of harms and losses or "Damages" in personal injury cases; (1) Special damages or economic damages: which include specific amounts billed or out of pocket, such as past and future medical bills, past and future lost wages, damage to property. The second general type of damages is (2) Non economic damages or pain and suffering. In the past medical bills were determined by the amount billed, not the amount paid. So if the injured victim was charged $100,000 in medical care but their insurance paid $50,000, at trial the evidence would be $100,000, not $50,000.

Currently, the billed versus paid amount being submitted to a jury is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court case of Deck v Teasley. See St Louis injury law article: "Under Missouri Personal Injury Law, Medical Damages are Amount BILLED to patient, NOT Amount PAID by Insurance; assuming proper evidence is established by Plaintiff" However, What if the medical bills are only partially paid and not satisfied in full by a lower amount paid by insurance, can the defense make a rebuttable presumption of reasonable value being the amount paid? As a practicing St Louis PI lawyer I think the answer is no.

An affidavit as to the amount partially paid with a balance owed should not invoke the rebuttable presumption of reasonable value created by Missouri Statute 490.715. As the statute specifically provides that " (2) In determining the value of the medical treatment rendered, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the dollar amount necessary to satisfy the financial obligation to the health care provider represents the value of the medical treatment rendered. R.S.Mo. 490.715.5 (2) (emphasis added.) If the medical providers bills are not satisfied in full then the defendant should not be entitled to the statutorily created presumption. No provision of law, and certainly not R.S.Mo. 490.715, allows Defendant to urge that the partial payment of a medical bill which does not satisfy the balance owed is the reasonable value of medical services provided to Plaintiff.

The Deck case did not completely resolve the billed versus paid battle. This is currently still a tricky area of law and is handled differently by different judges. At trial many Judges are currently allowing the plaintiff to submit evidence of the total amount billed and allowing the defense to submit evidence of the amount paid. However, neither side is allowed to comment as to why the numbers are different. Neither side is allowed to mention insurance, neither medical insurance or auto insurance. So they issue of billed versus paid is still not completely settled, but good injury lawyers are making sure they submit the strongest evidence on behalf of their clients to at least get the amount billed in front of a jury whether it is submitted with the amount paid or hopefully, just by itself.

St Louis car accident attorney and personal injury lawyer Ben Sansone of the Sansone / Lauber law firm has been practicing injury law for over 10 years in the St Louis area and across Missouri and Illinois. Call (314) 863-0500 or contact an injury lawyer online for a free no obligation consultation today.

According to a recent article on KSDK.com, the Missouri State Highway Patrol has recently released several tips for drivers after a fatal accident along a busy stretch of interstate in St. Louis. Southbound Interstate 55 was closed just this week when a pedestrian was struck and killed by a tractor-trailer near Sidney Street.

Police say the victim, 67-year-old Moustafa Elmansy, got a call from a friend saying he needed help. The friend was pulled over on the shoulder of I-55 after his car had run out of gas. The victim bought gas and rushed out to help his stranded friend. When Elmansy arrived, he parked in front of his friend's stalled vehicle and began adding gas to the car when he was clipped by a passing semi. Police have said that the truck driver told them he never saw the victim prior to the impact.

Missouri State Highway Police Sergeant Al Nothum said that if a driver encounters vehicle issues "always yield to the right." This is because drivers have significantly more room on the right shoulder than the left. Nothum says following a few guidelines can save you from a potentially dangerous situation, risking not only injury, but also death. The left shoulder, where Elmansy was hit and killed, is not a place to be outside of the car. A good general rule of thumb is to stay inside your vehicle where you at least have some level of protection. Once a driver exits the vehicle their chance of injury increases exponentially.

The Missouri Highway Patrol also has a toll free number for drivers who find themselves in dangerous situations while on the interstate. "Call *55 and inform them where you're at," Nothum said. "Give them a good location and tell them you need assistance immediately." Highway Patrol says that someone will be dispatched immediately to provide a safe perimeter and assistance.

The victim that was tragically killed was married with children. Though it is a horrible accident, police so far believe no serious charges are expected. However, the investigation remains ongoing.

Suffering from a pedestrian accident caused by another person's actions can leave you facing injuries that will affect your life in a number of ways. You need to understand that you do have rights to protect during this difficult time so that you can move forward. You can resolve this matter in a beneficial way when you ensure that your case is handled properly so that you do not suffer medical bills, lost work wages and other costs. With the help of an experienced St. Louis car accident lawyer, you can begin to move forward with your case and regain your life.

The tragic consequences of traffic accidents are why we at Sansone / Lauber repeatedly stress vigilance and awareness while operating motor vehicles. It only takes one or two seconds of distraction to cause irreparable damage. Our Missouri car accident attorneys regularly handle car accidents and cases involving pedestrians being struck by other vehicles. For information on how to protect your legal rights if you or a loved one has been seriously injured, call our office today for free at 1-314-863-0500.

Source: "Missouri Highway Patrol offers tips after Moustafa Elmansy killed on I-55," by Steve Patterson, published at KSDK.com.

See Our Related Blog Posts:
Defendant's Denial of Liability can Come back to Haunt Them

Evidence in Missouri Drunk Driving Car Accident Injury Case: Proving the Other Driver was Intoxicated

Often after a car accident or other injury the victim's future medical condition cannot be certain and often doctor's will opine that future surgery may be required as a result of the injuries sustained. This leads to the questions of ... when can the risk of future surgery be submitted to a Missouri jury for their consideration?

This issue was addressed by the Missouri Supreme Court in Swartz v. Gale Webb Transportation Co., 215 SW 3d 127 (MO 2007). This case arose from serious injuries, including lower back disc bulges, sustained after a car and bus collision. The plaintiff was the passenger in a car that was struck by a school bus owned by the defendant, Webb Transportation. The jury determined that the bus driver was at fault and as part of their verdict considered the need for potential future surgery. The defendant appealed claiming the jury should have never been able to hear medical testimony about future surgery and appealed on that ground.

The defendant argued that it was error to admit the doctor testimony that the Plaintiff's injuries put her at an increased risk of future surgery and other complications. Claiming that the experts were not able to testify that "more likely than not" the injured victim would need surgery in the future as a result of her injuries sustained. One expert testified that she had a 50/50 chance of requiring future surgery, a "more likely than not" standard requires a just a little bit more ...50.1% sure not just 50%. Additionally, the doctor admitted future surgery was "speculation" and could not be stated "within a reasonable degree of medical certainty". All buzz words or phrases that are problems for the Plaintiff to meet her burden of proof. See Injury Lawyer Article: Reasonable Degree of Medical Certainty Standard.

Despite the uncertainty of the future risk of surgery and problems, the testimony and evidence of future surgery and problems is admissible. It is admissible for purposes of establishing the nature and extent of the Plaintiff's current injuries.

"The fact that her back injury carries with it at least a 25 percent chance, and perhaps a 50 percent chance, of requiring surgery in the future makes it a worse injury than a back injury that has a lesser chance of future complications requiring surgery or that had fully healed by the time of trial."

Since the present injury brings with it this increased risk of future injury this "is information the jury should have in the difficult task of trying to give plaintiff's condition a dollar value." Because the testimony of doctors was admissible for the purpose of establishing the nature and extent of the victim's injuries, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony or in refusing withdrawal instructions.

Therefore, an experienced Missouri injury attorney will get any evidence of future problems in front of a jury so they can fully decide the damages to award and the full nature and extent of the injury. Even if it is speculation that the future surgery would be needed, it goes to the extent of the present injury. However, I believe if you want to ask for specific damages - the jury to award the cost of the future surgery - you need a doctor to testify it is more likely than not the surgery would be required and what the likely cost would be.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced a new safety rule, in an effort to reduce truck and bus accidents. The rule prohibits interstate truck and bus drivers from using hand-held mobile phones while operating their vehicles. The joint rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is the latest action by the U.S. Department of Transportation to end distracted driving. See Driving while testing v Driving While Intoxicated

LaHood said:

"When drivers of large trucks, buses and hazardous materials take their eyes off the road for even a few seconds, the outcome can be deadly....I hope that this rule will save lives by helping commercial drivers stay laser-focused on safety at all times while behind the wheel."

FMCSA research shows that use of a hand held mobile phone while driving requires a CDL driver to take risky steps beyond what is needed for use of a hands-free mobile phone, including searching and reaching for the phone. Commercial drivers reaching for an object, such as a cell phone, are three times more likely to be involved in a crash or other safety-critical event. Dialing a hand-held cell phone makes it six times more likely that commercial drivers will be involved in a crash or other safety-critical event.

I believe this regulation is common sense. Most states already ban texting while driving and many require hands free use of mobile phones for phone call while driving. See Texting and driving bans by state. In 2009 almost 5474 people died, often a wrongful death case, and 500,000 suffered auto or truck accident related personal injury as a result of distracted drivers.

Hand Held Cell Phone Bann Rule for CDL Drivers can be accessed here.

Continue reading "Truck and Bus Drivers' Use of Hand Held Cell Phones while Driving Banned " »

As St Louis personal injury attorneys, we see and handle a lot of cases involving traumatic brain injury (TBI). A competent brain injury lawyer will actively follow new bills that are introduced pertaining to insurance regulations which, in turn, greatly affect our injured clients with head injuries.

Recently Fox news published an article on the injustices surrounding traumatic brain injury cases. Brain Injury Patients Face Double Injustice -- Trauma and Mounting Bills Not only do patients suffer physical injury, but they must also deal with the surmounting medical bills that medical insurance will not pay. Example, Corey Beattie, 18 years old, was involved in a truck accident when she was the passenger in a vehicle hit by a truck. It took two hours for rescue workers to remove her from the mangled car. She had a broken neck and multiple fractures. The doctors said that her brain "spun within the frame of her skull". Corey's mother was informed that she would need at least one year of consecutive inpatient rehabilitation. But like so many others, her insurance would only cover 6 ½ months of rehab. She was released and sent to outpatient therapy. Research suggests that with a severe brain injury such as this, the brain needs this 12 month window to have the best chance of rehabilitation and regeneration. The brain surgeon was overruled by bureaucracy.

Insurance companies are notorious for refusing to pay the ongoing treatment needed to complete rehabilitation in TBI and other serious medical cases. A New Jersey representative is advocating that congress step in to correct this issue. His proposal is to have the Department of Health and Human Services make treatment of TBI a benefit under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. He is suggesting that the government will be able to better determine the guidelines for what will and will not be paid with the intention that patients can get the ongoing care that they need. Whether or not this is the best solution, something needs to be done to fix this problem.

St Louis injury lawyer, Ben Sansone, has handled multiple severe brain injury cases to successful conclusions. Including just a few mentioned below:

$575,000.00 drunk driving car accident and brain Injury Settlement. Client was a passenger in the back of a vehicle struck by a truck driven by a drunk driver in Illinois.

A young boy that was struck in the head by a loose commercial door post while at school. The evidence shows that the school faculty were aware of the defective post the day prior but failed to repair or warn o the condition. This particular case is still pending, but we believe it is just a matter of time before the case settles favorably.

Head Injury from St Louis Auto accident. Minor physical injuries but client suffered post concussion syndrome (PCS) a minor form of head injury.

$500,000 settlement for St Louis construction worker struck on head with board and suffered a head injury.

Continue reading "Potential New Insurance Regulations related to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) " »

Previously, I discussed recovery by 3rd parties against Missouri wrongful death settlements or judgments regarding medicare and also health care providers.

How about cases not involving wrongful death? Lets say you are involved in a Missouri auto accident with injuries and your health insurance, that you pay for, covers your medical expenses. Can that heath insurer now demand you pay them back from the proceeds of your auto accident settlement or judgment against the at fault driver? Absolutely not - but they try all the time.

As a St Louis Missouri lawyer with my primary practice focusing on all personal injury cases, I run in to this issue from time to time. Just recently, I had Blue Cross Blue Shield try and claim a lien and subrogation right against my client's money damages recovery against an at fault driver in a St Louis car collision lawsuit.

Under Missouri injury law it is clear that a lien or subrogation claim by a health insurer is against public policy. This standard under Missouri injury law has held since 1965 in the case of Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Chumbley, 394, S.W.2d 418, 425 (Mo.App.1965).

"It is also clear that a health care insurer may not be subrogated to its insured's right to recover from a third party tort-feasor because it would constitute an impermissible partial assignment of the insured's action for damages for bodily injury"

Also see Missouri injury lawsuit - Scroggins v. Red Lobster, No. SD 30214 Court of Appeals, Southern Dist 2010 stating:

“The Participant paid for health care coverage. The Insurer was obligated to provide those benefits regardless of whether the Participant pursued her personal injury claim. Missouri courts have never allowed a provider to be reimbursed for medical expenses that the insured recovers in a settlement from a liable third party under a lien theory, and we decline to do so now.”

Continue reading "Personal Injury Settlement in Missouri: Can Your Health Insurer Demand Payback for Medical Expenses?" »

August 21, 2007, 19 year old Kendra Lymon was driving her Dodge Neon through an intersection and was struck by Robert Bohn, a part time tractor-trailer driver for Bynum Transport, Inc. Another tractor-trailer in the opposite turn lane blocked Bohn’s view, but he turned left anyway hitting Lymon on her driver’s side and crushing the entire vehicle. Bohn insisted he had a green arrow, but it was later found, through eyewitnesses, that Lymon had the green light.

Prior to the accident Lymon was a student of South Florida community College, majoring in psychology. Lymon had a bright future ahead of her. She spoke six languages and was working as an aide for the Florida Institute of Neurologic Rehabilitation. Since the car accident, she has been left with extensive personal injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, which require her to be under constant supervision. She needs assistance with everyday tasks such as bathing, dressing, eating, and all routine tasks and must also use a wheelchair.

On March 18, 2009 a jury returned a personal injury verdict in the amount of $65 million for the plaintiff. Bynum Transport and Robert Bohn argued the amount was excessive, should be reduced and requested a new trial. In their appeal, they specifically challenged the $41,443,401 award for “pain and suffering, disability, physical impairment, disfigurement, mental anguish, inconvenience, aggravation of disease or physical defect, or loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life.”

In a one-page ruling, the Lakeland based appellate court affirmed the decision to award the jury’s verdict.

The family is pleased, as this money will help provide the 24-hour care Kendra needs to live.

A tractor trailer accident occurred around 11:30 a.m. this past Monday, at the Taylor Avenue overpass. The truck struck the median barrier that runs between east and westbound Highway 40 (Interstate 64), killing the driver, Thomas J. Niemeyer. At this time, witnesses and emergency responders are unsure of the reason why the driver lost control of the truck.

Witnesses said that the truck appeared to be traveling eastbound normally, when the driver abruptly veered to the left, hitting the concrete barrier and stuctural beam and was ejected from the truck. Currently, there are still some questions whether the driver suffered a medical emergency or if it was a mechanical issue that caused the driver to lose control of the truck.

We will be following this tragic accident closely.

Around 10:15 this morning 2 people were killed and 40 plus injured from what the Missouri Highway Patrol is calling a Missouri chain-reaction automobile accident on I-44 near Gray Summit. As a semi truck cab – no trailer attached – neared a slowed convergence area, caused by an approaching construction zone, a GMC pickup truck slammed into the back of the cab. The normal speed limit for that area is 70 mph.

Behind the pickup truck two school buses carrying 8th to 12th grade band students were en route to Six Flags for their annual school trip. The first bus carried the female students, while the second bus carried the male students. The driver of the first bus states that she did not see the two vehicles stopped and ran completely over the GMC and up onto the cab of the semi truck – as shown in the picture below. The second school bus then crashed into the back of the first bus.

The female driver of the GMC truck and one female student was killed, while more than 40 more were transported to local hospitals for minor injuries. Two students, aged 16 and 13, are now in stable condition. At this time, no other information is available regarding the condition of the student passengers.

This stretch of highway has seen at least 19 Missouri motor vehicle accidents with 33 fatalities between 2000 and 2007. Most of the Missouri car accidents occur near the Six Flags exit lanes on I-44. See devastating St Louis Missouri truck accident involving family of five as one of many examples. Whether it is defective roadway planning or driver inattention, this area has seen more than their fair share of fatalities.

This is an ongoing and tragic story and the personal injury victims and their families are in our prayers.

St Louis News Video Reporting on I-44 Truck / Bus Accident

On December 11, 2008 a St Louis City school bus transporting Carnahan high school students was involved in a violent crash. The official reports are vague, however, personal injury attorney Ben Sansone represents one of the students that was seriously injured and taken to Cardinal Glennon hospital. According to her, the bus driver attempted to pass traffic, accelerated quickly and then in order to avoid crashing into other vehicles ran off the road and crashed into a post and some utility structures. St Louis Missouri Bus Accident - Story on MyFoxSTL.com

On behalf of my client and as a St Louis Missouri injury lawyer, I will be pursuing damages against the bus company, who exactly that is is still under investigation and significant updates will be posted to this blog. However, it is clear that the bus driver was negligent, additionally, there may be additional issues, as in truck accident cases, of negligent retention, hiring, or training of the bus driver.

Several months ago I posted a Missouri personal injury lawyer blog entry regarding the top causes of bicycle accidents with motor vehicles and trucks, (bike accident article link) and discussed a case I was handling that was caused by the "right hook". Recently I was retained to represent an injured St Louis bicyclist that was injured as a result of "The Right Cross". See image for bike accident description. In this current St Louis bike accident case, my client was riding in a designated bike lane on Russell in downtown St Louis city and the negligent driver was driving a Hummer H2 when she made a right turn directly into him as he was crossing the intersection. Traffic on Russel at that intersection does not have a stop sign, however, cross traffic does. Again, this is a common cause of bike accidents, simple failure of drivers to recognize or even be aware of cyclists around them.

As a practicing Missouri bike accident lawyer, I have handled a lot of bicycle personal injury cases in St Louis and throughout Missouri and Illinois, and in almost every case the police report is written with a clear bias toward the cyclist, however, in this case I must commend the St Louis city police officer for writing a proper and non biased report. As discussed in a previous bike accident injury lawyer post, I had to take a bike injury case to trial because the insurance company refused to pay based on the police report blaming the cyclist. After a St Louis bike accident personal injury trial, the jury decides that it was the driver's fault and came back with a Plaintiff's verdict in favor of the bike rider I represented and blamed the driver for the accident, despite the police officer's report, because they saw the bias and poor reporting that I and other Missouri personal injury lawyers often see.

Just recently, an Alton Illinois bike accident with a large truck resulted in the tragic death of a bicyclist. The details of the accident are being held as the family is still being notified. From what little is known, the Alton bike accident seems similar to an accident in Pennsylvania when a truck hopped a curb when making a right turn and killed a woman bike rider. The truck company settled that case for $5.1 Million. See Personal Injury Wrongful Death Bike Accident Lawyer Settlement.

$18 million was recently paid by a trucking company operating across Missouri to the family of 4 women that were killed in a tragic truck accident on a Kansas City Missouri highway. A jury had returned a verdict of negligence for 3 of the 4 women, the verdict was $15 million; while the jury was deliberating on the punitive damages issue the truck company decided to settle for $18 million to cover the potential punitive damages award.

There was ample evidence that the trucking company did not properly screen the truck drivers and that the at fault truck driver had several problems that were either negligently missed or intentionally overlooked. Problems that would have kept the truck driver off the road.

From the perspective of a St Louis Missouri injury lawyer and a lawyer that handles St Louis Missouri truck accident personal injury cases, it was smart to resolve this case for $18 million, despite the potential for a massive punitive damages verdict. Families need closure, and despite the sensational punitive damages awards that Missouri lawmaker will often use as examples for tort reform, rarely are the punitive damage awards seen by the families as the appeal process drags on and prevents the closure of a tragic chapter in their lives. Additionally, Missouri law required that 50% of the punitive damage award goes to the state.

More importantly, settlement means no appeals, no more expenses, no risk of reversal. Anytime their is a multi million dollar judgment an appeal will follow, extending the case for years. Settlement means closure and money now.

Settlements are more important than Judgments in many wrongful death cases. In June 2007 we settled a case for $4.5 million regarding a St Louis Missouri gastric bypass medical malpractice wrongful death case. A similar case went to trial against the same doctor and the verdict was $7.5 million; however, the family never saw that $7.5 million; they settled for less than $2 million. The personal injury lawyer that got that St Louis death case verdict did excellent work, however, at the end of the day, his clients never saw the money from the large St Louis wrongful death verdict.

Truck Accident Wrongful Death Case

Currently we are handling a St. Louis Missouri personal injury truck accident case that involved a commercial truck driver whose truck was being repaired so his employer a Missouri trucking company rented a similar commercial truck from Penske truck rental. The large sleeper cabin in the back of the semi-truck did not have adequate safety equipment or padding for the sleeping or resting passenger who is often the secondary or relief commercial truck driver. The tractor trailer was involved in large truck accident outside of St Louis Missouri while my client was asleep in the back. He suffered serious personal injury while traveling through Illinois, mainly several cervical fractures from the Illinois truck crash, because the sleeper cabin had no padding and no way to secure a sleeping truck driver. Thus, he contacted us, top St Louis injury lawyers.

As a St Louis personal injury lawyer handling large truck accidents, I see this as a truck accident case against the liable driver, but also a Missouri products liability and a Missouri negligent maintenance case for the truck rental company's failure to have and maintain proper truck safety and security for the truck driver resting in the cabin.

I have handled cases in the past regarding rental cars being improperly maintained as they are often abused and the rental company wants to put as little maintenance money in them as possible to boost profit margins. This is a recipe for disaster, as someone is inevitably going to suffer serious personal injury as a result of the negligent truck maintenance.

Recently U-Haul incurred a judgment of $84 million as the result of serious personal injury to a man who was run over by a truck that he rented from U-Haul. The man parked the truck on a slight incline and when the parking brake failed the truck ran him over causing severe personal injuries, including a broken pelvis preventing him from walking ever again. The rental truck personal injury lawyers discovered the truck brakes to be defective and total lack of maintenance after several hundred thousand miles of rental truck driving.

The problem is the total lack of maintenance. For example, I was able to get a great settlement for a client regarding an Illinois bus accident lawsuit after he stepped in front of a Greyhound bus from in between parked cars, however, the Greyhound bus brakes were malfunctioning and the driver was unable to stop to avoid the collision. See - Illinois Bus Accident Injury Lawyer Lawsuit Settlement.

If you or someone you know rent a truck make sure to drive carefully and check to make sure the truck is operating properly. If you or someone you know are the victim of an unfortunate truck accident personal injury in St Louis Missouri or anywhere in Missouri or Illinois, call us, Missouri truck accident lawyers and Illinois truck accident lawyers.

St Louis Personal Injury Attorneys

Illinois Truck Accident and Injury Lawyer

A truck accident injury lawyer needs to be aware of the primary causes of truck accidents as thees causes and statistics become relevant when investigating a truck accident and determining causation and the specific act of negligence by a truck driver. The Large Truck Crash Causation Study (LTCCS) was conducted by the US highway safety administration in an attempt to define the cause of most truck accidents, specifically large trucks, i.e. Semis, tractor trailer, 18-wheelers. The study covered over 900 crashes involving more than 1,100 large trucks and about 950 cars. Out of these 963 crashes there were 249 fatalities and 1,654 injuries.

What are the primary causes of large truck accidents? The primary cause (about 32% of the accidents) were from the truck driver drifting or leaving their lane of travel into another or off the road entirely. The second largest cause (about 29%) is traveling too fast for conditions, cargo shift, mechanical failures, or claimed poor road conditions. Lastly, about 22% were the result of rear end accidents, specifically the truck causing and accident by running into the vehicle in front of it.

Truck accident causation is important to injury lawyers in the prosecution of their client's claims because often the statistics ring very true to us when handling truck accident cases and pining down the cause of the accident and thus the liability on the truck driver's shoulders.

In addition to the critical factors above there are also high risk factors for truck accident causation, specifically, the highest risk factor, cargo shift. To an untrained accident lawyer may mean no fault on the driver, however, cargo shift is often the result of loading the trailer improperly or failing to secure the truck cargo to avoid the cargo shift and the leading cause of truck operators to lose control and cause an accident.

Most of the remaining factors when combined, make up a majority of the high risk factors resulitng in large truck accidents involving injury or death and those are:

1. Truck driver making an illegal maneuver - (9% of truck accidents)
2. Truck driver inattention - (9% of truck accidents)
3. Truck following too close - (5% causation of large truck accidents)
4. Truck driver Over the Counter Drug Use - (17% of truck accidents)
5. Truck driver speeding or traveling too fast for the conditions - (23% of truck accidents)
6. Truck driver failing to keep an adequate lookout - (14% of truck accidents)

LARGE TRUCK CAUSATION STUDY

DOT PRESS RELEASE - Study Concludes Driver Behavior Causes Most Truck Accidents

Ms. Jacobs was traveling on I-70 when a fatigued truck driver fell asleep at the wheel and swerved into her and forced her off the highway. As a result of the truck accident she suffered shoulder impingement that required surgery.

The case was transferred to me after several years of drawn out litigation with another personal injury law firm that initially filed the injury case. The client came to us because she wanted her case pursued aggressively by personal injury trial lawyers. Her prior lawyers were not pursuing the case diligently, they failed to prepare and set the case for trial which keeps continued pressure on the insurance company.

When my office received the case the offer from State Farm Insurance, the insurer for the negligent truck driver, was about $20,000. I prepared the case for trial, primarily by getting the client's treating doctor's medical testimony on the record which supported her injuries, continued symptoms, medical treatment, and the doctor's opinion that the accident was the sole cause for the injuries and resultant symptoms.

More importantly, we amended the Injury Petition to a "Negligence Per Se Petition" based on the fact the negligent truck driver was cited by the police for careless and imprudent driving, moreover, the negligent truck driver plead guilty to and was convicted of the careless and imprudent driving, therefore, the issue of liability was was essentially admitted by the truck driver's plea of guilty and conviction. The negligence per se Petition was allowed by the Judge, thus adding tremendous pressure on State Farm. The issue at trial was not both liability and damages, but only damages now.

The defense lawyers for State Farm increased their offer by more than double within a few days of trial to $45,000. This was an exceptional injury settlement based on the medical bills of about $13,000 and the client's injuries which she recovered from.