Missouri Injury Law Blog

My client was riding her road bike on Old Gravois Rd. in south St Louis county on a Sunday afternoon, when she was thrown from her bike and seriously injured. The injured St Louis cyclist ended up with a broken clavicle and a host of other abrasions, scars, road burns, lacerations, and contusions.

What caused this biker to be thrown from her bike? A three inch diameter black hose laid across the street on a downhill slope in the middle of a Sunday afternoon. This created a dangerous condition for Missouri bikers as there were no warnings or other notices to the public using that road that a 3" obstruction was on the road just down the hill. Additionally, the black color and fact it was on a steep downhill slope created limited visibility of the hose and a bicyclist would not see the hose until it is too late to stop. This road is routinely used by cyclists and that coupled with the dangerous conditions above make the accident and injury to cyclists legally foreseeable.

On behalf of my client, I am pursuing a Missouri personal injury bike accident claim against the builder that was using the hose and hydrant outside of its permitted use and in such as way as to create an unreasonably dangerous condition on a St Louis Missouri public roadway.

This hose was hooked up to a fire hydrant across the street from a construction site the at fault party was using. They had a permit for use of the hydrant, but it was limited for a specific purpose and not allowed use on the weekend. The builder was using this hydrant outside of the permitted use certificate. The improper use and improper warning was the cause of this Missouri bike accident injury.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Bicycle Accidents

Bookmark:

Sansone Law has been retained to represent the family of a 17 year old girl that was tragically killed when a teenage driver ran off the road killing the front seat passenger and critically injuring the back seat passenger. KSDK News Story. The negligent and reckless driver decided to go well over 70 MPH on Pioneer Road in Hillsboro Missouri (just outside St Louis County). The speed limit on that road is 40 MPH, for obvious reasons, it is a narrow and curvy road. The picture above is the stretch of road showing the turn the driver tried to come around at 70 MPH in and older model Ford Contour, he took the turn wide and another car was coming from the other direction, he over corrected and ended up crashing the car into trees off the road and down a hill. The surviving passenger has stated she felt as if they were airborne.

This tragic Jefferson county car accident resulted in the death of the front side passenger and severe injury to the backseat passenger, who recalls the she and the deceased passenger were begging the driver to slow down. Upon a cursory review through Missouri Casenet this driver has been charged with several other traffic citations prior to this Missouri car crash.

The Jefferson County prosecutor's office has charged the driver with the Missouri state charge of involuntary manslaughter, a class D Felony. Much to the disappointment of the family, he was quickly released on a $3,500 bond; quite low considering he caused the St Louis Missouri area wrongful death of one young girl and the severe and permanently debilitating personal injuries to the back seat passenger.

There are many details and aspects of this Missouri wrongful death case that I would like to discuss as a Missouri personal injury lawyer, however, I will have to post these aspects of the Jefferson county wrongful death case at a later date as the investigation and claims are ongoing. I would ask that we all keep the young girl's family in our prayers and pray for the health and wellness of her young one year old son that has survived her.

I traveled down pioneer road several times today, and it is a narrow road, I was driving my Porsche 911 C4S (a car made to take tight turns at high speed), and at 70 MPH that curve was challenging, clearly in an older model Ford Contour 70 MPH on that road is simply crazy recklessness beyond a simple accident; moreover, the roads were wet that night. On behalf of the mother and surviving infant son, I will pursue Missouri personal injury claims of wrongful death against the driver based on negligence and gross recklessness justifying the imposition of Missouri punitive damages.

St Louis Post Dispatch Article by Robert Kelly - Jeffco Teen Driver Charged in Passenger's Death

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Automobile Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In a previous Missouri personal injury lawyer blog post I discussed the facts and circumstances of my Illinois workers compensation client who witnessed the traumatic death of a co-worker as the result of a fall from a water tower. As a result of witnessing this tragic death incident, which has turned into a million dollar Illinois wrongful death case and Illinois products liability action, my client suffered post traumatic stress.

This Illinois workers compensation case recently settled for $32,500.00 to compensate my Illinois personal injury and workers compensation client for the traumatic stress endured as a direct result of the work related injury.

Many Illinois personal injury lawyers may have never pursued the claim because there was no direct physical injury. In fact, my client's first Illinois personal injury lawyer did not pursue the claim and recommended a settlement to him of less than $10,000. I took over the case and through psychological testing and other important case work we were able to evidence the psychological injury and settlement the case for more than 3 times more what his first Illinois work comp lawyer recommended.

An Illinois or a Missouri work comp case or claim require one very simple element to have a claim in the first place, a work related injury. That injury can be physical or mental. Often times a mental injury is drastically more debilitating than a physical injury.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Verdicts & Settlements , Workers' Compensation

Bookmark:

Recently I settled an Illinois Workers Compensation case for $500,000, see Illinois Work Comp Death Case Settlement. Now that the Illinois worker's compensation case is resolved I am pursuing an Illinois products liability death lawsuit resulting from a improperly manufactured or designed cantilever that did not close and thus failed to prevent the worker from falling to his untimely death. A good Illinois personal injury lawyer must look beyond just the worker's compensation liability and investigate other potential defendants and theories of legal liability that allow the client to recovery beyond workers compensation, as the amount recoverable is limited by regulation.

When is there more to recover than just work comp? In the above case, the clients came to me because their first lawyer refused to pursue the products liability case and just wanted to represent them on the Illinois work comp case. The products liability case in this matter is what is known as a 3rd party claim. Generally, workers' compensation statutes and regulations prevent any other recovery by an injured worker or his family other than from work comp insurance through the work comp courts. Recovery is limited and regulated. However, when another party besides the employer is at fault there may exist a third party personal injury case. Many lawyers just want the work comp case and do not want to pursue the other parties, if you find yourself in this situation call me, because we always look into that possibility, and in the above case lead to an Illinois personal injury products liability wrongful death case. As in the above case, the original Illinois work comp attorney refused to take the products liability case, through investigation we have discovered that the cantilever is defective and thus the family has a claim worth potentially millions of dollars. Fortunately, they contacted me and we were able to explore these options and find a wrongful death products liability case.

What is a products liability case? A products liability case is simply as case wherein a defective product caused personal injury. In the above case, the cantilever malfunctioned or was improperly designed as it failed to close, allowing the lanyard to come unhooked from a water tower and allow the worker to fall, causing his unfortunate death. The specific cause of the malfunction I cannot get into at this point, however, as the picture to the right demonstrates, the cantilever fails to close and leaves over a one inch gap. Therefore, based on the facts and witness testimony regarding the fall it will show that had the clip closed all the way the lanyard would not have come unhooked and the worker would not have fallen from the top of the water tower and died. The defect is the libility, the circumstances leading to the fall are the causation, and the death is the damages, the three general requirements for a successful Missouri or Illinois personal injury lawsuit that an injury lawyer looks for.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Products Liability / Dangerous Products , Workers' Compensation

Bookmark:

In a recent Missouri personal injury post I discussed a St Louis Missouri products liability personal injury lawsuit I have brought on behalf of my client, a young girl, that suffered a serious eye injury when playing with a toy knife that was unreasonably sharp. For fact details see: St Louis Missouri Personal Injury Lawsuit Eye Injury - Dangerous Product - Toy Knife.

The primary eye injury was a serious laceration to the front of her eye that cut through the cornea and the iris. This required several surgeries, first to sew up the laceration then a cataract occurred and a lens implant became necessary as well. As a result, this young girl will suffer vision problems for the rest of her life as well as an over-dependence on her uninjured eye. To the right is a detailed rendition of the injury as well as part of the medical surgical procedure to repair the eye.

What is the value of an eye injury? A Missouri and Illinois personal injury attorney bases that on many factors, the primary ones being the past and future medical bills and costs. Also, past or future lost wages. These are damages that are referred to as "special damages", meaning that they can be specifically calculated. Additional damages are pain and suffering, often referred to as "non economic damages" or loss of enjoyment of life. These are non economic damages as there is not a receipt, bill, or specific price tag attached with this type of damage. The non economic damages awarded by one jury may be very different than the damages awarded by another jury; assuming both find liability to be clear. This is the area of damages that separates top Missouri personal injury lawyers from the rest.

Similar eye injury related personal injury lawsuits have settled for several hundred thousand dollars and more. Other cases where blindness becomes an issue have settled or had a verdict in the millions. In the case above, I believe my client's injury is valued close to $500,000. This is based on the general amounts of the verdicts and settlements for similar type cases across the country as well as my evaluation of the case based on liability, medical damages, future problems, and general pain and suffering. Fortunately, my client did not suffer blindness and will be able to lead a normal and healthy life.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Products Liability / Dangerous Products

Bookmark:

A client of mine who has had various adventurous and dangerous jobs took a job working for an oil drilling company doing the heavy lifting and work with the drilling rig. Unfortunalty he was severely injured as a result of a 2-3 ton drill collar falling and crushing his foot and injuring his right leg. He is now looking at having his right foot amputated as a result of this work related accident and injury.

My client was hired in Illinois and is an Illinois resident, therefore, most likely Illinois worker's compensation law will apply to this case, despite the fact that the injury occurred outside of Illinois. This is important because Illinois has more favorable workers' compensation laws than most other states. So keeping his work comp case in Illinois is a high priority for me.

The lose of a limb, if only one limb, is what is referred to in Illinois work comp law as 'permanent partial disability" because the injured employee is not permanently disabled but only partially. If both feet, or both hands, were lost then it becomes a permanent total disability as the likelihood is that the employee will not be able to work again.

How is PPD (Permanent Partial Disability) defined in Illinois Work Comp Law:

PPD is:
a) The complete or partial loss of a part of the body; or
b) The complete or partial loss of use of a part of the body; or
c) The partial loss of use of the body as a whole.

“Loss of use” is not specifically defined in the law, but it generally means the employee is unable to do things he or she was able to do before the injury.

See Handbook on Illinois Worker's Compensation and Occupational Disease

The employee's benefit is calculated using the Illinois Work Comp disability chart indicating how many weeks of pay an injured employee gets for an injury.

If a body part is amputated or if it cannot be used at all, that represents a 100% loss, and the employee is awarded the entire number of weeks listed on the chart. If the employee sustains partial loss the benefit is calculated by multiplying the percentage of loss by the number of weeks listed.

HOW MUCH IS THE AMPUTATION WORTH:

Amputation or enucleation: 133 1/3% of Statewide Average Weekly Wage (SAWW). Currently the illinois SAWW is about $1,000. The minimum PPD benefit for amputation is 50% of the statewide average weekly wage (SAWW). The dispute comes in as to how much of a disability of the body as a whole, i.e. what percentage, should be attributed for the loss of a foot. That percentage is applied to 500 weeks, to get the number of weeks times the applicable weekly wage to get the amount.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Workers' Compensation

Bookmark:

Recently I took a case to trial in St Louis Missouri regarding a bicycle accident and injury of a broken elbow. The bicyclist underwent surgery and had a bolt put into her arm to secure her bone as the fracture was complex. See Image Below.

On the day of trial often and victim of personal injury, as in this bicycle accident injury case, will look like they are in good health, primarily because it is usually several years since the injury and they have had time to heal from the external and more obvious symptoms. Additionally, the injured party is sitting in a comfortable chair most of the time. This often creates a disconnect in the mind of the juror. Jurors have told me before that one of the difficult issues during deliberation was that the Plaintiff did not look hurt. St Louis Missouri Personal injury trial lawyers need to use demonstrative evidence to get the severity of a client's injury across to a jury when it is not visually obvious.

In the above referenced Missouri bike accident injury case, the injured cyclist's broken elbow at the time of trial, 2 years after the bike accident, was not obvious and the illustration used was very effective in explaining to the jury the severity of the injury. Demonstrative evidence and courtroom technology are very important personal injury lawsuit trial tools. Elaborate presentations, videos, audio, and graphics grab the attention of the jury and the visual impressions make a more profound impact on jurors.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases

Bookmark:

Earlier this year, my client, a young impressionable freshman at Lincoln University in Jefferson City, Missouri, sustained serious personal injuries as a result of sorority hazing. She was severely paddled as part of the initiation that resulted in menacing tissue damage on her buttock requiring several days of hospitalization and surgery, including a skin graft.

I am filing a claim and potentially a Missouri personal injury lawsuit against Lincoln University, the Tau Beta Sigma Sorority, and the individual members responsible for the brutal injuries. Two sorority members were arrested as a result of the injuries and the University is having an internal hearing on the matter.

The injuries that my client suffered definitely opens the individuals up not only to an intentional tort claim, but also a claim for punitive damages as well as potentially exposing the national sorority to a negligence and punitive damages claim. Additionally, we have reason to believe that incidents similar to this have happened in the past at Lincoln University and the University may have failed to act on past instances and failed to prevent this one.

I remember my Greek days when I was in a fraternity that had a pretty tough initiation process, but I never saw anyone get physically injured, especially not requiring medical care. Fraternity and sorority hazing are well know for humiliating or breaking down their initiates and then building them back up. Callous physical hazing was thought to be a thing of the past, however it is something that still goes on and needs to be addressed when it become public through an initiate being so injured that they have to go to the authorities.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases

Bookmark:

We recently settled a Missouri personal injury case stemming from a motorcycle accident outside of Union Missouri. One of the at fault drivers had a policy of insurance for $100,000 and a few months after filing a Missouri motorcycle accident personal injury lawsuit, the driver's insurance tendered the entire amount of insurance coverage. There were some disputes as to which car caused the accident as one witness claimed that a car abruptly stopped in the left lane causing the driver mentioned above to swerve to the right and strike my client on his motorcycle.

The vehicle that stopped abruptly did not stay around and was never identified, therefore, under Missouri law, it is a uninsured motorist and the injured party's uninsured motorist coverage applies for the negligent actions of the unidentified motorist. Thus, we are pursuing the injury claim beyond the policy limits above by seeking compensation from the motorcyclist's uninsured motorist coverage insurance carrier.

Word to the wise, as a St Louis personal injury lawyer and a motorcyclist myself, I strongly recommend to all motorcyclists to max out your insurance coverage as you may be hit by someone with minimum insurance coverage or even no coverage and your only remedy will be your own uninsured and under insured motorist coverage.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Verdicts & Settlements , Motorcycle Accidents

Bookmark:

An Illinois personal injury case has arisen from my client's use of a Fisch Electric Log Splitter. As you can see from the picture to the right, the electric motor and plunger engagement lever must each be operated by a separate hand and must each be held down during the log splitting process, forcing the user into a prone position with their face as a prime target for any ejected log pieces. The picture demonstrates the prone position the operator must be in as the right hand holds down the electric motor switch and the left hand holds down the plunger lever; both must be held down during operation.

What safety measures are in place? Wearing safety goggles which do not protect the face. What safety measures should be in place? Simple, a metal guard, an operation switch that allows the operator to step away from the machine while splitting the logs, a longer plunger handle allowing distance from the splitter bed and not forcing the operators face to held in a dangerous position prone to serious personal injury. Any one of these design suggestions by themselves or in combination would likely prevent many injuries.

In the current Illinois products liability injury case I am handling, the log piece violently jumped out of the splitter bed and struck my client in the face as he was forced to remain in the prone position during operation with no safety guard. He was knocked unconscious and soon after waking up was taken to the local emergency room. He ended up with a severely broken nose along with several contusions and lacerations to his face. He has recently undergone his initial surgery to reconstruct and repair his nose and the doctors are expecting the recovery process to require several surgeries due to the nature and extent of the facial injuries.

We are currently accepting log splitter injury cases and lawsuits nationwide. If you or a loved one have been injured or killed by this type of log splitter or one similar to it please contact us.

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Products Liability / Dangerous Products

Bookmark:

As most experienced injury lawyers will agree, Missouri and Illinois medical malpractice cases are often the most difficult type of personal injury cases to pursue. Doctors, hospitals, health care providers and medical malpractice insurance companies fight all medical malpractice lawsuits and claims persistently and unscrupulously, even when liability is clear. Clear liability does not matter to the health care industry and medical malpractice insurers, they always deny legal responsibility.

Many victims of medical negligence and their families that I have represented in St Louis and across the state of Missouri often cannot believe the medical providers unashamed denial of fault, especially when it is clear. This is compounded when your clients are parents and their injured young son, as in a malpractice case I am currently handling. This medical negligence case involves a 4 year old boy who inexplicably went into a state of unconsciousness and was also showing multiple outward symptoms of seizure and other type of neurological deficits. The symptoms the boy was showing almost exactly parallel the symptoms all the medical literature states are the signs and symptoms of herpes encephalitis,a viral infection that attacks the brain by causing swelling and permanent neurological and brain injury and damage . The parents rushed their son to the local emergency room, however, despite these clear signs of a problem, the emergency room doctor, and his pediatrician who showed up, diagnosed the boy with an ear infection and sent him home about an hour after he arrived at the emergency room. Unfortunately, after being sent home, the child suffered intense seizures that caused irreversible and permanent brain injury. Upon readmission, the attending emergency room physician quickly identified the symptoms and took the appropriate medical action.

Recently, we deposed the emergency room physician and the pediatrician. Through almost an entire day of depositions of the doctors, the parents understandably had a hard time dealing with the blatant denial when the facts were so clear. This coupled with the fact that their son is permanently suffering neurological damage and the severe and life altering symptoms that come with such a brain injury. Many people, including injury lawyers, often do not realize the intensity required to effectively take a medical deposition when the witness is a doctor defendant. Most doctors are very intelligent and are good at responding evasively; long intense depositions are necessary to get as close to the truth as possible. During my first several years of dealing with medical malpractice cases I gained high respect for Missouri medical malpractice lawyers upon realizing the complexity and hard work required to successfully pursue medical malpractice cases.

The above case represents a Missouri medical malpractice case with true merit as there is legal liability for medical malpractice (someone was negligent) and there are damages (injury that causes economic loss and pain and suffering). We will pursue this case to trial and seek money damages to cover the minor child's reduced earning capability and future medical care; expected to be more than $5,000,000. As far as pain and suffering, that is capped by Missouri law at $350,000. This cap effectively eliminates Missouri medical malpractice cases unless their are significant injuries as the limitation of damages sometimes make the case economically unfeasible to pursue, as the one above. You have a lifetime of future care, lost wages, opportunity, or other economic damages pushing the case into the multi-million dollar medical malpractice case category.

Missouri Injury Lawyer Reference Source - Missouri Medical Malpractice Petition - Failure To Diagnose - Claim against Admitting Emergency Room Doctor, Consulting Pediatrician, and Hospital as the Employer

Posted by Benjamin J. Sansone | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Our Injury Cases , Medical Malpractice

Bookmark: